Syed Hamid : ISA是政府决定, 任何部长不应质疑

Datuk Hishammudin Said : will be brought into Cabinet meeting, do not agree with the reason of arrest of the reporter.
Tan Sri Bernard Dompok :no sufficient reason for arrest.
Subramaniam : will bring bad impression.
Ong Tee Keat : shall repeal ISA.
Ong Ka Chuan : to consult the member of Cabinet and/or BN first.
Liow Tiong Lai : Do not agree that the civilian is arrested to be protected.
Zaid Ibrahim resigned from his ministrial post after criticising the arrest under ISA.

This shows that the matter was not brought to the Cabinet's meeting. When a matter is not deliberated in the Cabinet meeting, it is upon decision of one person/persons, how can the whole Cabinet be imposed with such duty? Collective Responsibility (CR) in my opinion is only applicable when one matter is duly discussed and deliberated in the Cabinet meeting and the although do not receive unanimous agreement but passed by the Cabinet meeting with decision to proceed. Then those who are members to the Cabinet cannot latter said that he do not agree with the decision in public eventhough he/she was absence during the previous meeting. This is what we called "Collective Responsibilty".

From the reading in papers we realised that so many ministers had voiced their concerned also indicated that the matter was not discussed in the Cabinet. If it is not discussed in the Cabinet, what collective responsibility does it mean? Reason given and granted by Datuk Syed Hamid seems to suggest that he does not know the meaning of CR.

If your own collegue is unaware of the action of you, what CR do you want to imposed on them? Is it fair for other to share the responsibility when the action was taken unilaterally by you? Please rationale it properly.

Syed Hamid, Do you know what you are talking?

Arrested to be protected? What type of rationale is this Mr Minister?
We have seen in Hong Kong Series that any one to be protected will be informed first.
The series also shown that the "Protectee" will always be treated very well, like VVIP.
Please ask around Mr Minister, who wants the freedom to be curtailed?
Who wants to be taken into custody?
Who wants to be placed in a lock up?
Who wants to excahnge the safety for a lock up experience?
All the answers will be no, no, no, no, no...

I have always says that an action of the government shall be duly considered before it is carry out. Sadly this time we realised many ministers have voice their concerned over the arrest of the reporters. Our Minister for Internal Affairs seems to have no answer to all those question posted to him that caused the answer of being protection measure. My Dear Sir Minister, Syed Hamid, Please discuss with your collegues before action is taken by you especially when you are put to incharge of the Ministry that is so important, the freedom of people is in your hand. One slight action of you will create a lot of problems in the country. I am not saying that you are not capable however more minds together make a different when it is only you, right?

This can be evidenced by having so many Ministers and leaders of the Component Parties, Zaid Ibrahim, Ong Ka Ting, Ong Tee Keat, Ong Ka Chuan, Liow Tiong Lai, Bernard Dompok, Koh Tsu Khoon, Wee Ka Siong etc-etc voicing their concern and disagreement of the use of ISA. Some have called for the repeal of the ISA, some have requested for consultation before action is taken.

This once again prove that, the Minister shall consult with the members of the cabinet and/or discuss with all the leaders of the component party as this is a very drastic action which require careful action set aside that the ISA shall only be used against the armed troop that is a threat to the national security not civilian.

So once again, the Minister Syed Hamid, please use the ISA sparingly and restricted only to the real national threat not on civilian. There are so many laws in the coutry that may be useful against these people.

被捕

小时候,爸妈总是会说"你如果坏蛋,警察会来".
小学时,老師总是会说"不要害怕,警察是我们的朋友".
中学时,老師总是会说"不用担心,警察会维持秩序及治安".
大学时,老師总是会说"警察是国家的...".
社会上,人们总是会说"警察有什么好怕?应为他们 ... "

警察捉坏人,(刑事法典)
警察捉政治人物,(ISA)
警察捉记者,(是什么法典?ISA?)

我想,星洲日报的记者是坏人吗?
我想,应该不是吧!
我想,星洲日报的记者是政治人物吗?
我想,应该不是吧!
那为什么用ISA呢?

她只不过是,报道有关一名巫统前领袖的极端不负责任的言论.
她被捕,但有关的巫统前领袖没事.
首相啊!首相啊!
请您好好的应用人民给予您的委托,应用您的智慧把这个国家好好的治理.
法典法律是必须应用得当方能有效的啊!

星洲日报的记者不会是坏人,也不是政治人物.没有做出任何坏事,请你把他给放出来吧!
新闻自由重要,是应该被尊重的.

新生活的开始

2/9/2008马青柔佛州分团新届执委会竞选提名,
3/9/2008-5/9/2008马青柔佛州分团竞选期,
6/9/2008马青柔佛州分团竞选完毕.
9/9/2008这些在这个时候已成过去.
请各位竞选的同志们,把过去让他过去吧.
现在开始让我们关心国家大事,党的前程吧.
让我们一起来把柔佛州马青当做是我们的家.
让我们把柔佛州马青的同志们视为兄弟.
让兄弟们共同努力,
让兄弟们共同工作,
让兄弟们一起配合,
只有这样柔佛州马青一定强.

伤心的人更伤心

这两天,全马来西亚的华人都有忍无可忍的感觉(我认为).这都是因为那个阿末不知好歹,完全不尊重我们各簇同胞及社会的安宁.阿末啊!阿末!如果你还是这个样子,不但完全没多悔过;还变本加历的伤害到全华人的心,我说国阵将会因为你的过错而不被原谅的.我个人认为发表这种伤害人民的言论,以种簇和蔼做为赌博;而且也把我们华人对国家共献给抹杀了.对华人不敬的程度已到了一个不是一声"对不起"就可以解决的了.

你啊!还要说这是记者的过错.你讲的是历史纪录,讲实话讲道里.我希望,你好好的反省.不要把这个美好的家园给破坏了.我们华人对着个国家是不是100%效忠的.不效忠这个国家的人是像你着样的人.你的言论严重的破坏了这个国家安寧.我希望首相及副首相能对发表这种言论的人绳之以法.

我们的国家是一个法制的国家.有足够的法典及法律来控告违法人.首相啊!首相啊!请你动动手吧.把阿末给控告上法庭.