Thursday, December 2, 2010

PR's Conflicting Views

PR used to say we fight for the betterment of whole Malaysia irrespective of whether you are a Malay, Chinese, Indian or others. That is marvelous and exciting ideology. However, many issues after this have seen that they do not walk the talk and do not talk the walk.

Just few days ago, PAS said that when PR took over Putrajaya, hudud law will be introduce in stages. DAP keep mum and no says anything about it. Is this silence tantamount to agreement? What does PKR say? Nothing! Is this for the people and for whole Malaysian?

When DSAI said LKS will be the DPM, I thought that is true! Then, PAS said not discussed before, no one knows about it! Even LGE said never discussed before? LKS when asked said no comment!

If it is not discussed before then why did DSAI said so? I thought DSAI must either be in entirely full control of PR or it is another 916?

Today came the Guru of PR, Nik Aziz, once you are a muslim you can even be PM or DPM. Hah! I thought they are talking about policy of Malaysian. Or no he is segregating people in Malaysia with religion but race! A new policy of PR?Is this all agreed by PR member? Is this what we called the common platform? Common principle?

Why we do not the PR member giving their views on what Tok Guru Nik Aziz had just said? YB LKS, YB KARPAL, YB LGE, YB TCK, YB CE, YB TNC, YB LWS, YB TONY PUA, YB LLY, YB TIAN CHUA, YB LKB, YB HANNAH YEOH, etc-etc where are you all?

Friday, October 15, 2010

Overseas trip with my collegue

Having working hard for many years, the company decided that the staffs has to be rewarded. Having discussed with all the staffs and the management we decided that we have a trip for the staffs. Even though this is a yearly event of the firm, we decide that this year we shall go out of the country. All the staffs that have been working hard for the past one year, we are now in Phuket.

Friday, September 17, 2010

Jamal Talks Again

Jamal is now talking about unity of the country. Strangely, he linked unity of the country to the teaching medium in the school. Why should one think that teaching medium is the stumbling block to national unity? Has he forgotten that, when he was suspended that, the nation was defending him without having regards to the language that he was using! Has him also forgotten that when he was suspended no one actually talk about him being of what race? Come on, unity is not just what language you speak, what food you eat and what religion you are.

Sadly, having benefited from the language he is now implying that the language will become a stumbling block to unity. Illogical!

(read singchew jit pao on page 23 dated 17th September 2010)

Thursday, February 4, 2010

ISA Should be In Action Now

If at all ISA is still relevant in the current state of the affair in the Country, then such operation shall be put into force these few days. I am not advocating that ISA shall be maintained, however at the moment it is still the law in the country. A person, no matter how high his position may be, he shall abide by the law in the country.

I personally is of the opinion that since the a special officer in the Prime Minister Department Datuk Nasir had made such statement which I would see it as a threat to the national security (because it would create havoc in the country if suc thing is not handle properly) shall be arrested under such law, ISA.

His action of resigning from the post would not spare him the consequences of making such statement. Eventhough, the Minister in the Ministry of Home Affair had said that he will be investigated under the Seditious law, I think it warrants a more stringent measure taking into the account the gravity of the statement.

Further, such statement is against the 1Malaysia concept by his own BOSS, the PM?

Saturday, January 16, 2010

High Legal Fees and Costs Mar Joy of Owning PPR Units

I read a report on page M4 of the The Star on 15th January 2010 that says High Legal Fees and Costs Mar Joy of Owning PPR Units.

First of all, I would agree that PPR units is meant for lower income group in the country. I suppose that those units shall be units of houses that is below the RM100,000.00 or even at a price as low as a couple of ten thousands. Let us presumed that it is within the range of RM25,000.00 to RM100,000.00. Basing on the the range of price above the Legal Fees on Sale and Purchase Agreement shall not be more than RM1,000.00 as provided by the Solicitors' Remuneration Order 2006. However, if the property is governed by the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 [Act 118] the Solicitors Remuneration Order 2006 also provides that the following shall apply:-

a) RM250, if the consideration is RM45,000 or below;
b) 75% of the applicable scale fee specified, if the consideration is in excess of RM45,000.00 but not more than RM100,000.00;
c) 70% of the applicable scale fee specified, if the consideration is in excess of RM100,000.00 but not more than RM500,000.00; or
d) 65% of applicable scale fee specified, if the consideration is in excess of RM500,000.00

If it is a sale and purchase that is not governed by the Act 118, the scale fee shall be as follows:-

First RM150,000.00 the fees to be charged shall be 1% (subject to minimum of RM300)
For the next RM850,000.00, the fees to be charged shall be 0.7%
For the next RM2,000,000.00, the fees to be charged shall be 0.6%
For the next RM2,000,000.00, the fees to be charged shall be 0.5%
For the next RM2,500,000.00, the fees to be charged shall be 0.4%
Where the consideration or the adjudicated value is in excess of RM7,500,000.00, the fees to be charged shallnegotiable on the excess (but shall not exceed 0.4% of such excess)

Based on the above it is actually very clear, whether the legal fees charged on the PPR units are excessive or otherwise. It is easily escertaineable by the leaders who brought the issue through the press. Do some calculation you will know. The leaders will definately have friend who is lawyer. If he does not have one(amazingly), bring the matter to BAR Council, the question will be answered. Why do they HAVE TO bring the issue through the press. What is their mitive? Publicity or Politise the issue?

It is said that upon execution of the Sale and Purchase Agreement, the purchasers has to pay a sum of RM5,582.00 shall be referred to the Bar Council for clarification. One shall also look into the invioce properly. What are the charges meant for?

I am of the opinion that making a sweeping statement and put the blame on the High Legal Fees will not solve the issue. I personally had an experience with this issue when a real case of overcharged was brought to me, it was settled without any press conference or press release.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010


4。单亲家庭问题,政府拨出RM15 Million,为什么不是1MALAYSIA的慨念来拨呢?


Thursday, January 7, 2010



Tuesday, January 5, 2010